I took a quick trip to New York in mid December, leaving on a Monday morning and back in my own bed by Wednesday night.
The trip was planned around a concert, but while in the city my friend Liana and I also made it up to the Metropolitan Museum of art to see the "Women Dressing Women" exhibit and managed a little bit of fabric shopping in the garment district. I was admittedly not ambitious, feeling no need to be out seeing and doing everything, and yet it was still enough.
Most of the photos in this post are from the Women Dressing Women exhibit. Somehow I neglected to identify some of the dresses, and so there may not be information forthcoming along the lines of "who, what, when, or where" the all important rules of identification that were drilled into me in my youth. Most of the things that appealed to me were antique or vintage. It also struck me, and this is definitely a biased interpretation, that the more sophisticated clothing has become, technologically, the less creatively appealing it has become to me in an organic sense. Again, my own interpretations of what is and what is not creative, what does and does not flatter. All is subjective and ephemeral, perhaps even generational, arising from the relationship of the wearer to the world in which she lives. My own connection to the world has already been shaped and formed by a world that is already in the past. I do not wish to live in the past, and yet nor can I completely escape it.
I was particularly excited to see a dress by Lucile Ltd from 1922. (not a dress I would actually wear) You might recall that I read a novel A Dress of Violet Taffeta in late summer and had wanted to see more garments designed by Lucile, Lady Duff Gordon. I had gotten the impression from the novel that Lady Duff Gordon was no longer the exclusive designer for Lucile Ltd by the 1920s. My understanding may be faulty, and it is perhaps insignificant. Anyway the dress was a thrill, and it reminded me of the story and the writing about the colors and drape and flow of chiffon.
I am not posting these photos in their order in the show.
Although I may not have recorded details about most of the dresses some are still quite identifiable. The dress above for example is classic Hanae Mori. I was fascinated by Hanae More as a child, and would daydream of a life in her clothes. My interest continued as young adult and I would clip photos from magazines whenever I could find them. Yet it had been some years since I had thought of Hanae Mori's designs or realized that this youthful fascination had played a role in my own aesthetic.
Many of these things I would wear today, although I wouldn't necessarily do the work involved in creating them.
Mostly I think the show was both inspiring in terms of design and ideas but also serving as a focal point reminding me of the layering of my own perspective onto the world and onto clothes.
This was similar in many ways to the shopping jaunts I made into the garment district. I found that my attentions were far more focosed than they are when I am, for example, fabric shopping online. I found that although a room full of fabrics and fabric samples can initially seem overwhelming, my brain narrows and winnows out the excess in a very specific way, something that does not happen with online shopping. Of course more sense are involved in the process: Visual acuity, because actual three-dimensional fabric looks different than any photograph; scent; touch, including softness, structure, drape; even sound, the scroop of certain fabrics, some silks especially, when rubbed together; scent. , scent, touch. My viewing of dresses at the metropolitan, and my perusal of fabrics held a common thread even though there was no direct line between the kinds of garments I was observing and the fabrics or garments I was contemplating.
I wouldn't have thought the experiences would have been related at all, other than an interest in clothes. But I found myself surprised by insights and connections, to music as well. But that is another post.