I'm back from my summer travels and it is wonderful to be home even though once again I am struggling to get back into a routine. Traveling was wonderful and much time was spent with family and friends. If less time than anticipated was spent knitting and reading, it is not such a bad thing. A summer sweater remains unfinished, but there is ample time on the horizon for solitary knitting. There was also little time for summer reading. Yet, between meals and conversations, walks, visits, swims, and time spent with family culminating in my brother's wedding, a few books were completed.
I finally got around to reading Tish Jett's Forever Chic in early July while in Mohonk. It seemed like a light read, a soothing balm at the end of the day, and it lived up to its promise. The book is well written and personal; reading it is much like settling in for a cup of coffee and conversation with a friend. Yes it does include information on rather expensive cosmetic procedures and products, but also much practical advice about common-sense approaches and the importance of a lifetime of care and attention to face, body and mind. Yes Frenchwomen do exercise, and yes they do watch what they eat, but the emphasis here is different than the standard American approach, at least the one I grew up with. Unlike many books it does not read as a bible of specific instructions, with the author repeatedly reminding us that each of us will find different solutions while recommending an informed approach. I was also thrilled that the author points out that beauty, charm, and allure come not only from the surface, although this should not be ignored, but from within, noting that the French women of whom she writes are also interested, engaged, and informed about the world, and that this active engagement in the world and that this very engagement forms an important part of their allure. This is refreshingly different from the beauty or intelligence dichotomy that still seems to plague parts of American culture.
On the last day of our Mohonk visit, my step-son Adam, gave me a book he had just finished, Tom Clancy's Command Authority, and I started reading it at the hotel that very evening, after a rather stressful day of driving, and I found it to be an enjoyable read. Clancy was a great storyteller and this book is no exception. I am not a critical-enough reader of Clancy's oevre to discuss whether this book is better or worse than his earlier novels, or the differences in approach, being more interested simply in whether or not the book was enjoyable, Indeed it was. Yes it is heavy on political and military minutia, as is the case in many of the Jack Ryan novels, and many readers may not have the patience for this. Yes the involvement of Jack Sr. and Jack Jr. seems implausible at times, but then the entire Jack Ryan package is extremely implausible. We don't look for everyman in our superheroes though, and Jack Ryan is an American superhero. The book was engaging enough, and driving enough that it was difficult to put down, proving to be an entertaining and satisfying read.
Next up, a book that had been on my towering "to read" stack for a few years now, Eric Metaxas' Bonhoeffer: Pastor, Martyr, Prophet, Spy, which I started without realizing that a theme was developing: the idolization of men as unambiguous ideolized superheroes. And herein lies the problem; it is not that Dietrich Bonhoeffer was not a hero, a martyr, a man of deep conviction and profound courage and faith, a man whose faith carried him further than most people are willing to go in terms of standing up for truth. He was all of that and more. The problem is that Metaxas paints a rather simplified and one-sided portrait of Bonhoeffer as a hero for the elites and although it is true that Dietrich Bonhoeffer did come from an elite background, the book plays this up consistently and to great effect. Bonhoeffer is the hero of the educated, the hero of the upper classes fighting against the uneducated, the rude, and the crude. This is a biography turned into a morality tale. Metaxas also grossly oversimplifies Bonhoeffer's theology and his development as a theologian, relying heavily on Bonhoeffer's writings as a young student and as well as some late writings, neatly avoiding any indications of development and inner struggle. Of course, one would note that Theologian, is not a part of the title of the book, so it would make sense that this is no biography of Bonhoeffer as a theologian.
Now, given this litany of complaints, one might think that this is a bad book. It is not, although I would deem it rather average. It is mostly well written, with a mostly engaging style. It is however defnitely limited. If the book introduces Bonhoeffer to those who knew nothing of him, it has yielded something good. If some of those readers go on to read Bonhoeffer's actual writings and learn more of the man and his theology it might even be deemed a success. It has certainly made me want to reread Bonhoeffer, with the result that, rather than reducing the size of the old "to read" pile, this book actually served to increase it.
Then, without conscious intention, another book from the pile popped up, The Secret Race by Tyler Hamilton and Daniel Coyle, or a book that could be described as the a study of the hero as everyman. This book was good. The story was well told and engaging. Yes it is a particular story, Tyler's story, and he comes across as likeable and understandable. It seemed, however that he made points that we should all consider, the old, well-worn mantra of "What would you do in the same situation?" Yes he doped. Yes he claims everyone did it, and given the statistics it seems he was correct. But several other points come out. Even though everyone doped, or almost everyone at least among the elite riders, those at the top, some still managed to do better than others, it took more than doping to achieve success. Some were more honest (relatively) than others, some were not. And the big question remains, the "what would you do". For the truth is that we are, for the most part, all Tyler Hamiltons. We all want to succeed, to be liked, to be in the cool crowd. We all tell ourselves little stories and little white lies to cover our less than laudable choices. Most of us are like the German elites who simply hoped that Hitler would go away. Most of us are like Tyler Hamilton and the other riders who took dope because they just wanted a chance to succeed, to show what they could do, and who believed they had no other choice, even if that belief was wrong. Most of us are not like Dietrich Bonhoeffer. Luckily most of us are not like Lance Armstrong either. It is true that he does not come out well in this book; it is not his book after all. At the same time, from an observer's standpoint, Hamilton never came across as particularly likable during the period of his Tour de France wins. But we don't always expect our heroes to be likeable and we sometimes confuse arrogance and confidence. In many ways Armstrong was and is a prisoner of his own success, his need to win. As Hamilton points out, winning goes to your head. It can make you think you are better than everyone else; it can make you forget that reality is much more fragile. This is a engaging, touching and humanizing book, a reminder of the tentative nature of our own humanity, as a reminder of the toll our yearning for superheros really takes, both on those we idolize and ourselves.